|
Rune Origins 1
Rune Origins 1
Thule
Island theory
Runes
are said to have been passed on by the mythical Hyperborean, the
fabled peoples of the Northernmost Isles. Some scholars say runes
originated in the second century B.C.E., when the Cimbri and the
Teutons invaded the Italian peninsula and came into contact with
the North Etruscan and Latin alphabets. Other scholars believe
that runes were formulated by the Goths in the first and second
centuries C.E., on the Baltic coast. As early as the first century
C.E., the Roman scholar Tacitus describes what many scholars’ on
runes believe to be indeed runes' being used in divination
practices. He writes that a priest, priestess, or the head of the
household would inscribe runes on strips of wood cut from a
fruit-bearing tree, then close his/her eyes, turn to the north,
invoke the goddesses and gods, and cast the runes on a white
cloth. According to Tacitus, Thule Island was first sighted by the
Roman Fleets in the first century. Thule Island may well have been
Iceland today:
“Never
before had a Roman fleet sailed round the coastline in this most
remote sea, and so established that Britain is indeed an island.
At the same time they found and conquered the Islands known as the
Orcades (Orkneys), at that time quite undiscovered (or at least
they landed on them- it would have been impossible to sustain a
military presence there). They even looked closely at Thule,
(Thule - `Ultima Thule` was considered to be the very furthest
land in the world; likely to have been the Shetlands, though just
conceivably Iceland) - but no more than that, as they had no
orders to go any further, and winter was approaching”.
Elder
Fuţark
"The
Elder Futhark is thought to be the oldest version of the runic
alphabet, and was used in the parts of Europe which were home to
Germanic peoples, including Scandinavia. Other versions probably
developed from it. The names of the letters are shown in Common
Germanic, the reconstructed ancestor of all Germanic
languages."
Anglo-Saxon
Fuţark
"A
number of extra letters were added to the runic alphabet to write
Anglo-Saxon/Old English. Runes were probably bought to Britain in
the 5th century by the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Frisians
(collectively known as the Anglo-Saxons), and were used until
about the 11th century. Runic inscriptions are mostly found
on jewelry, weapons, stones and other objects. Very few examples
of runic writing on manuscripts have survived. “[The chart that
follows is incomplete. There are additional A-S runes, which you
can see here.]

Younger/Scandinavian Fuţark
"This
version of the runic alphabet was used sporadically in
Scandinavia, in particular in Denmark and Sweden, until about the
17th century.
The commonality of symbols of all of the following alphabets makes sense
when one considers the migration of ancient peoples from the east
to the west.
The people and languages of northern Europe are considered
"Indo-European" because of this migration. It's not
unreasonable that customs, languages, alphabets, mythology, etc.
share common origins. If this is to be believed, than Semitic
races may have added their “alphabet system” to that of the
Germanic Futhark.
Etruscan Alphabet
"The
Etruscan alphabet is thought to have been developed from the Greek
alphabet by Greek colonists in Italy. The earliest known
inscription dates from the middle of the 6th century BC. More than
10,000 Etruscan inscriptions have been found on tombstones, vases,
statues, mirrors and jewelry. Fragments of an Etruscan book made
of linen have also been found. Most Etruscan inscriptions are
written in horizontal lines from left to right, but some are
boustrophedon (running alternately left to right then right to
left).
Used
to write: Etruscan, a language spoken by the Etruscans, who lived
in Etruria (Tuscany and Umbria) between about the 8th century BC
and the 1st century AD. Little is known about the Etruscans or
their language."
Archaic Etruscan alphabet (7th-5th centuries BCE)

Neo-Etruscan alphabet (4th-3rd centuries BCE)
Latin Alphabets
"The
Old Italic alphabets developed from the west Greek alphabet, which
came to Italy via the Greek colonies on Sicily and along the west
coast of Italy. The Etruscans adapted the Greek alphabet to write
Etruscan sometime during the 6th century
BC, or possibly earlier.
Most of the other alphabets used in Italy are thought to have
derived from the Etruscan alphabet."
Ancient Latin
The
earliest known inscriptions in the Latin alphabet date from the
6th century BCE. It was adapted from the Etruscan alphabet during the 7th
century BC. The letters Y and Z were taken from the Greek alphabet
to write Greek loan words. Other letters were added from time to
time as the Latin alphabet was adapted for other languages."

Faliscan

Marsiliana

Messapic
"The
Messapic alphabet is thought to have derived directly from the
Greek alphabet, rather than developing from the Etruscan alphabet.
The only known inscriptions in the Messapic alphabet date from the
2nd and 1st centuries BC. The Messapic language was not related to
other languages of Italy."

Middle Adriatic/South Picene

North Picene
Oscan

Umbrian

Roman Alphabet for Latin
"The
Romans used just 23 letters to write Latin. There were no lower
case letters, and K, X, Y and Z used only for writing words of
Greek origin. The letters J, U and W were added to the alphabet at
a later stage to write languages other than Latin. J is a variant
of I, U is a variant of V, and W was introduced as a 'double-v' to
make a distinction between the sounds we know as 'v' and 'w' which
was unnecessary in Latin."
But
what other alphabets may have influenced runes? Remember that over
the millennia there was a great migration of people, spreading
from the birthplace of mankind, in the "middle east" to
what are now Europe and northern Africa. Ancient people did
travel--a lot--and long before the Vikings became known as
explorers and traders.
Hungarian Runes
Hungarian
runes (Székely Rovásírás) are descended from the Kök Turki
script used in Central Asia.
They were used by the Székler Magyars in Hungary before István,
the first Christian king of Hungary, ordered all pre-Christian
writings to be destroyed. In remote parts of Transylvania however,
the runes were still used up until the 1850s. Hungarian runes were
usually written on sticks in boustrophedon style (alternating
direction right to left then left to right). The runes include
separate letters for all the phonemes of Hungarian and are in this
respect better suited to written Hungarian than the Latin
alphabet.

Turkish Runes
The
upper rune rows are the Elder Futhark variants. The lower rune row
shows the Turkish Runes and their phonetic equivalents.
Tifinagh Abjad
"The
Tifinagh or Tifinigh abjad is thought to have derived from the
ancient Berber script. [Berbers were mountain people, who lived in
northwestern Africa, in what is now Morocco.] The name Tifinagh
means 'the Phoenician letters', or possibly comes from the Greek
word for writing tablet, 'pínaks'. It is not taught in schools,
but is still used occasionally by the Tuareg for private notes,
love letters and in decoration. For public purposes, the Arabic
alphabet is used."

The South Arabian Alphabet
"The
South Arabian alphabet is known from inscriptions found in
southern Arabia dating from between 600 BC and 600 AD. Its origins
are not known. The South Arabian alphabet, like Arabic and Hebrew,
includes only consonants. It was written from right to left in
horizontal lines. The top rows of letters are written in
monumental style, while the bottom rows of letters are in cursive
style. "

Sabaean or Sabaic alphabet
"The
Sabaean or Sabaic alphabet is one of the south Arabian alphabets.
The oldest known inscriptions in this alphabet date from about 500
BC. Its origins are not known, though one theory is that it
developed from the Byblos alphabet. The Sabaean alphabet, like
Arabic and Hebrew, includes only consonants. Unlike Arabic and
Hebrew, Sabaean has no system for vowel indication. In most
inscriptions it is written from right to left, in some it is
written in boustrophedon style (alternating right to left and left
to right). It was used to write Sabaean, an extinct Semitic
language spoken in Saba, the biblical Sheba, in southwestern
Arabia. The Sabaeans managed to unite southern Arabia into a
single state by the 3rd century AD, but were conquered by the
Abyssinians in 525 AD. "
The European scholars have come to recognise from the very
beginning the obvious similarity between the character forms of
the Primitive Norse stones and those of the Central Asian Gokturk
monuments, but for certain various reasons have refrained from
tackling this point by denying all kinds of plausible relations.
All throughout the period of 160 years that elapsed between the
years of 1730 and 1893, that is between the discovery of Orhun
monuments and their definitely final decipherment, fanciful
theories were fabricated about the Vikings' (or Indo-Germans', or
Celts', or Goths') prehistoric emigrations into Central Asia, and
the erection of Orhun stones as landmarks of their presence and
civilisation dating back to several thousands of years BC in that
region.
Only when in 1893, it was understood that these inscriptions were
not written in any other tongue but pure Turkish, then those
fanciful theories were discarded, and the proposed pre-historic
dating were revised to be not earlier than AD 700. Even today, a
number of academicians are still straining at finding a Sogdian,
Persian or Aramaic origin for Turkish inscriptions, but their
efforts at proving their claims all end in vain. A casual
comparison of ancient scripts is all needed to see that the
characters used in Orhun monuments are more identical with the
futhark than any of those alleged originals. Besides this close
resemblance, it is an exciting fact that the Primitive Norse
runes declared to have ambiguous contexts can be rendered
meaningfully when they are exposed to our novel method of reading
ancient Turkish scripts.
Kjell
Aartun is a doctor of philosophy and language-researcher who
writes in his book,
(RUNER
i kulturhistorisk sammenheng, En fruktbarhetskultisk tradisjon,
Pax Forlag, Oslo 1994.), that he has proven that the runes
were not inspired by the Greek and Latin alphabets. He argues that
it is opposite, maintaining that the Norwegian runes are identical
with runes which were used in Semitic language areas such as
Trojan Asia Minor and Canaan (Palestine) as far back in history as
2000BC.
The runes are, after Kjell Aartun’s opinion, one of many
oriental writing-systems which were the basic platform by which
the Greek and Latin alphabets later developed. Additionally, he
writes that he can prove that the first Norwegian runic
inscriptions were written in a Semitic language, citing known
cult-based erotic texts, many of which included holy depictions of
the act of making love.
According to Aartun, new archeological finds show that many people
from the Mediterranean Sea area, and especially the Cretans (who
were Semitic), often traveled to the north on trading tours. He
says that during the Migration Period many Semitic-speaking people
came to Norway. Aartun writes that this conclusion is born out by
actual facts which Snorri refers to when saying: "these
Asians was called aeser and in the northern countries the Asians
spread so much that their language was the common language in all
these countries."
Kjell Aartun's theories are not accepted by authoritive Norwegian
runeologists.
Blekinge's
Most Ancient Runic Inscriptions, - Manifestations of Semitic
Fertility Cult
Ref:
http://home9.swipnet.se/~w-93783/index.html
Back
Quick Links:
[
Rune Origins1 ]
[
About me ]
[ Asatru &
Heathenry ] [
Links ] [
Freyja Runes Seidr
] [
Sabine the
Wolwa ]
[
Little
Bones Women ] [
Pierced by the light
] [
Rorik's
Column ] [
Rune Lore ] [
Rune
Origins ]
[
Rune Poems
] [
Rune Scholars
] [
Rune FAQ
]
[ Guido
von List ]
[
Poetry ]
[
Viking Age
Costumes
]
[
View Comments ]
[
My Reviews ]
[
Modern Myths
] [
Controversies
] [
Book Hoard
]
[
Book
Reviews ] [
Norse Mythology ]
[
HE Davidson ] [
Lotte Motz ]
[
NA Runestones ]
[
Your
Articles
]
 |